Gay Marriage Is Upheld in Nevada and Idaho
By ERIK ECKHOLM
OCT. 7, 2014 - New York Times
A federal appeals court on Tuesday
struck down same-sex
marriage bans in Idaho and in Nevada, the latest in a nearly unbroken string
of courtroom victories for gay couples.
The decision, by the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, came a day after the
Supreme Court allowed similar rulings by three other appeals courts to stand,
clearing the way for same-sex marriage to start immediately in Indiana,
Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin and to be extended soon to six other
states in those circuits.
gThe lessons of our constitutional
history are clear: Inclusion strengthens, rather than weakens, our most
important institutions,h Judge Stephen R. Reinhardt wrote in the three-judge
panelfs unanimous ruling. gWhen same-sex couples are married, just as when
opposite-sex couples are married, they serve as models of loving commitment to
all.h
Tuesdayfs decision will lend
impetus to marriage-ban challenges in Alaska, Arizona and Montana, which are
also in the Ninth Circuit.
Hours later, the appeals court
issued mandates to implement the ruling. As a result, Idaho could begin
authorizing the marriages this week, although Gov. C. L. Otter said that the
courtfs decision was gdisappointingh and that state officials were evaluating
how to respond.
In Nevada, Gov. Brian Sandoval and
state Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto said it could be two weeks before
a final order is issued by a United States District Court judge. But at least
one county clerk said she would begin issuing the marriage licenses on
Wednesday.
The Idaho case was brought by four
same-sex couples who were represented by private lawyers and by the National
Center for Lesbian Rights. In the Nevada case, several couples were represented
by Lambda Legal.
In its decision, the appeals court
found that marriage restrictions in Idaho and in Nevada imposed gprofound legal,
financial, social and psychic harmsh on gay couples and their children, and
dismissed as gwithout merith the assertion by both states that bans on same-sex
marriage promote the welfare of children.
gPlaintiffs are ordinary Idahoans
and Nevadans,h the court wrote. gLike all human beings, their lives are given
greater meaning by their intimate, loving committed relationships with their
partners and children.h
The three judges on the panel were
appointed by Democratic presidents: Jimmy Carter appointed Judge Reinhardt, and
Bill Clinton appointed Judges Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon.
With Mondayfs Supreme Court
decision and Tuesdayfs ruling in San Francisco, the number of states authorizing
same-sex marriage, which was 19 last week and 24 as of Monday, is likely to
approach 35 in coming weeks, as the legal aftermath of the four appeals-court
decisions issued to date plays out.
In addition, another federal
appeals court, the Sixth Circuit, in Cincinnati, is expected to rule soon on the
validity of same-sex marriage bans in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and
Tennessee.